Exactly. And the Ia Tangata report makes a very well-evidenced and well-reasoned case for that position.
Gender critical rhetoric often relies on emotive arguments and unsupported claims and falters when held to a higher ethical and legal standard. The Law Commission authors clearly came to understand that, much to the displeasure of some. Calling them incompetent or ideologically captured for not being persuaded by your arguments doesn't really do you any good.
One of the things the Law Commission noted is that this level of emotive disagreement is exactly why discrimination protections were necessary for marginalised groups historically.
Excellent, thank you for this. Trans rights are not radical, they are routine human rights
Exactly. And the Ia Tangata report makes a very well-evidenced and well-reasoned case for that position.
Gender critical rhetoric often relies on emotive arguments and unsupported claims and falters when held to a higher ethical and legal standard. The Law Commission authors clearly came to understand that, much to the displeasure of some. Calling them incompetent or ideologically captured for not being persuaded by your arguments doesn't really do you any good.
One of the things the Law Commission noted is that this level of emotive disagreement is exactly why discrimination protections were necessary for marginalised groups historically.